When dealing with infringement of copyright, you may wonder what your legal options are. Litigation is one possibility. But is it always the best? Sometimes, litigation does not work out in your favor.
In these cases, it is important to know what other methods of dispute resolution are available to you. These alternative methods can offer you things traditional litigation may not be able to.
Working with a mediator
FINRA discusses some potential options outside of litigation. Two of the most popular are mediation and arbitration. Mediation often benefits arguments that do not involve complex assets or large sums of money. It is also best if you think you and the other parties can come to an agreement on your own.
A mediator acts as a referee to your discussion, but play a minimal role. They may offer opinions or suggestions from a third party perspective. They also step in to defuse arguments and ensure everyone gets to speak. They cannot make a legally binding decision like a judge or arbitrator, though. The final decision is entirely in your hands.
How arbitration works
Arbitration works better for more severe disagreements. It is one step away from litigation. An arbitrator listens to all sides present their case. They then make a decision that all parties must follow. This still costs less and takes less time than taking your case to court, as you do not need a hearing.
Litigation still presents itself as a viable option. But you may want to discuss your situation with a legal expert before making a decision. They can help you choose the best option.